NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics Chapter 12 - Atoms

NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics Chapter 12 - Atoms: Additional Questions

The Atoms NCERT Solutions of Additional Questions provide detailed answers to extra problems beyond the main exercises. These solutions help students strengthen their understanding of atomic structure, electron transitions, and energy levels, boosting confidence for board exams and competitive exams like JEE and NEET.

Q1.(a) Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better. Is the average angle of deflection of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?

Answer:

The average angle of deflection of $\alpha$-particles by a thin gold foil predicted by both models is about the same.

Q1.(b) Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better. Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of $\alpha$ -particles at angles greater than ${90}^{\circ }$ ) predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?

Answer:

The probability of backward scattering predicted by Thomson’s model is much less than that predicted by Rutherford’s model.

Q1.(c) Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better. Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness t, the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to t. What clue does this linear dependence on t provide?

Answer:

Scattering at moderate angles requires a head-on collision, the probability of which increases with the number of target atoms in the path of $\alpha$ -particles, which increases linearly with the thickness of the gold foil and therefore the linear dependence between the number of $\alpha$ -particles scattered at a moderate angle and the thickness t of the gold foil.

Q1.(d) Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better. In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of the average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil?

Answer:

It is completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of the average angle of scattering of $\alpha$ -particles by a thin foil in Thomson's model, as the deflection caused by a single collision in this model is very small.

Q2.The gravitational attraction between an electron and a proton in a hydrogen atom is weaker than the coulomb attraction by a factor of about ${10}^{-40}$. An alternative way of looking at this fact is to estimate the radius of the first Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom if the electron and proton were bound by gravitational attraction. You will find the answer interesting.

Answer:

As per Bohr's model

$m_e{v}_n{r}_n=\frac{nh}{2\pi }$ (i)

If the proton and the electron were bound only by gravity, the gravitational force between them would provide the centripetal force required for circular motion

$\frac{m_e{v}_n^2}{r_n}=\frac{G{m}_e{m}_p}{r_n^2}$ (ii)

From equations (i) and (ii), we can calculate that the radius of the ground state (for n=1) will be

$r_1=\frac{h^2}{4\pi G{m}_p{m}_e^2}$
$r_1=\frac{(6.62\times {10}^{-34}{)}^2}{4\pi \times 6.67\times {10}^{-11}\times 1.67\times {10}^{-27}\times (9.1\times {10}^{-31}{)}^2}$

$r_1\approx 1.2\times {10}^{29}m$

The above value is larger in order than the diameter of the observable universe. This shows how weak the gravitational forces of attraction are as compared to electrostatic forces.

Q3. Obtain an expression for the frequency of radiation emitted when a hydrogen atom de-excites from level n to level (n–1). For large n, show that this frequency equals the classical frequency of the revolution of the electron in the orbit.

Answer:

Using Bohr's model, we have.

$v_n=\frac{e^2}{2nh{\epsilon }_{0_{}}}$

$r_n=\frac{n^2{h}^2{\epsilon }_{0_{}}}{m_e\pi e^2}$

$E_n=\frac{1}{2}m{v}_n^2-\frac{e^2}{4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}_n^2}$
$E_n=-\frac{m{e}^4}{8n^2{h}^2{ϵ}_0^2}$

$E_n-E_{n-1}=-\frac{m{e}^4}{8n^2{h}^2{ϵ}_0^2}-(-\frac{m{e}^4}{8(n-1{)}^2{h}^2{ϵ}_0^2})$
$E_n-E_{n-1}=-\frac{m{e}^4}{8h^2{ϵ}_0^2}[\frac{1}{n^2}-\frac{1}{(n-1{)}^2}]$
$E_n-E_{n-1}=-\frac{m{e}^4}{8h^2{ϵ}_0^2}[\frac{-2n+1}{n^2(n-1{)}^2}]$

Since n is very large, 2n-1 can be taken as 2n and n-1 as n

$E_n-E_{n-1}=-\frac{m{e}^4}{8h^2{ϵ}_0^2}[\frac{-2n}{n^2(n{)}^2}]$
$E_n-E_{n-1}=\frac{m{e}^4}{4n^3{h}^2{ϵ}_0^2}$

The frequency of the emission caused by de-excitation from n to n-1 would be

$\nu =\frac{E_n-E_{n-1}}{h}$
$\nu =\frac{m{e}^4}{4n^3{h}^3{ϵ}_0^2}$

The classical frequency of revolution of the electron in the nth orbit is given by

$\nu =\frac{v_n}{2\pi r_n}$

$\nu =\frac{e^2}{2nh{ϵ}_{0_{}}}\times \frac{m_e\pi e^2}{2\pi n^2{h}^2{ϵ}_{0_{}}}$

$\nu =\frac{m{e}^4}{4n^3{h}^3{ϵ}_0^2}$

The above is the same as the frequency of the emission during de-excitation from n to n-1.

Q4. (a) Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, a thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom, which you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom ( $\approx {10}^{-10}m$ ). Construct a quantity with the dimensions of length from the fundamental constants e, me, and c. Determine its numerical value.

Answer:

Using dimensional analysis, we can see that the quantity to be constructed and consisting of m_e, e and c will also have ${ϵ}_0$ and will be equal to

$\frac{e^2}{{ϵ}_0{m}_e{c}^2}$ and has a numerical value of 3.5 $\times$ ${10}^{-14}$, which is much smaller than the order of atomic radii.

Q4.(b) Classically, an electron can be in any orbit around the nucleus of an atom. Then what determines the typical atomic size? Why is an atom not, say, a thousand times bigger than its typical size? The question had greatly puzzled Bohr before he arrived at his famous model of the atom, which you have learnt in the text. To simulate what he might well have done before his discovery, let us play as follows with the basic constants of nature and see if we can get a quantity with the dimensions of length that is roughly equal to the known size of an atom ( $\approx {10}^{-10}m$ ). You will find that the length obtained in (a) is many orders of magnitude smaller than the atomic dimensions. Further, it involves c. However, the energies of atoms are mostly in a non-relativistic domain where c is not expected to play any role. This is what may have suggested Bohr to discard c and look for ‘something else’ to get the right atomic size. Now, Planck’s constant h had already made its appearance elsewhere. Bohr’s great insight lies in recognizing that h, me, and e will yield the right atomic size. Construct a quantity with the dimension of length from h, me, and e and confirm that its numerical value has indeed the correct order of magnitude.

Answer:

Using dimensional analysis, we can see that the quantity to be constructed and consisting of m_e, e, and h will also have ${ϵ}_0$ and will be equal to

$\frac{{ϵ}_0{h}^2}{m_e{e}^2}$ and has a numerical value of approximately 6.657 $\times$ ${10}^{-\mathrm{10,}}$ which is about the order of atomic radii.

Q5. (a) The total energy of an electron in the first excited state of the hydrogen atom is about –3.4 eV. What is the kinetic energy of the electron in this state?

Answer:

Since we know that kinetic energy is equal to the negative of the total energy

K=-E

K=-(-3.4)

K=3.4 eV

Q5. (b) The total energy of an electron in the first excited state of the hydrogen atom is about –3.4 eV. What is the potential energy of the electron in this state?

Answer:

Total Energy = Potential energy + Kinetic Energy

E=U+K

U=E-K

U=-3.4-3.4

U=-6.8 eV

Q5. (c) The total energy of an electron in the first excited state of the hydrogen atom is about - 3.4eV. Which of the answers above would change if the choice of the zero of potential energy is changed?

Answer:

The total energy would change if the choice of the zero of potential energy is changed.

Q6. If Bohr’s quantisation postulate (angular momentum = $\frac{nh}{2\pi }$ ) is a basic law of nature, it should be equally valid for the case of planetary motion. Why then do we never speak of the quantization of orbits of planets around the sun?

Answer:

We never speak of Bohr's quantisation postulate while studying planetary motion or even the motion of other macroscopic objects because they have angular momentum very large relative to the value of h. In fact, their angular momentum is so large compared to the value of h that the angular momentum of the Earth has a quantum number of order ${10}^{70}$. Therefore, the angular momentum of such large objects is taken to be continuous rather than quantised.

Q7. Obtain the first Bohr’s radius and the ground state energy of a muonic hydrogen atom [i.e., an atom in which a negatively charged muon ( ${\mu }^{-}$ ) of mass about 207m e orbits around a proton].

Answer:

As per Bohr's quantisation postulate

$m_{{\mu }^{-}}{v}_n{r}_n=\frac{nh}{2\pi }$

Similarly, like the case in a simple hydrogen atom, the electrostatic force acts centripetally

$\frac{m_{{\mu }^{-}}{v}_n^2}{r_n}=\frac{e^2}{4\pi {ϵ}_0{r}_n^2}$

From the above relations, we can see that in Bohr's model, the Radius is inversely proportional to the mass of the orbiting body, and Energy is directly proportional to the mass of the orbiting body.

In the case of hydrogen, atom r 1 is 5.3 $\times$ 10^-11 m

Therefore, in the case of a muonic hydrogen atom

$r_1=\frac{5.3\times {10}^{-11}}{207}$

r 1 = 2.56 $\times$ ${10}^{-13}$ m

In the case of the hydrogen atom, E 1 is -13.6 eV

Therefore, in the case of a muonic hydrogen atom

$E_1$ =207 $\times$ (-13.6)

$E_1$ =2.81 keV

NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics Chapter 12 - Atoms: Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions

The Class 12 Physics Chapter 12 - Atoms Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions require students to apply their knowledge of atomic structure, electron behaviour, and energy levels in a complex situation. Such solutions aid in the improvement of analytical and problem-solving skills, which are essential during JEE or NEET preparation.

Q.1 The electron in the hydrogen atom first jumps from a third excited state to a second excited state and then from a second excited state to the first excited state. The ratio of the wavelengths ${\lambda }_1:{\lambda }_2$ emitted in the two cases is
Answer:

Here, for wavelength ${\lambda }_1$, ${\mathrm{n}}_1=4$ and ${\mathrm{n}}_2=3$.

And for ${\lambda }_2,{\mathrm{n}}_1=3$ and ${\mathrm{n}}_2=2$.
We have, $\frac{\mathrm{hc}}{\lambda }=-13.6[\frac{1}{{\mathrm{n}}_2^2}-\frac{1}{{\mathrm{n}}_1^2}]$
So, for ${\lambda }_1$

$\begin{array}{r}\Rightarrow \frac{\mathrm{hc}}{{\lambda }_1}=-13.6[\frac{1}{(4{)}^2}-\frac{1}{(3{)}^2}]\\ \frac{\mathrm{hc}}{{\lambda }_1}=13.6\left[\frac{7}{144}\right]---(i)\end{array}$

Similarly, for ${\lambda }_2$

$\begin{array}{r}\Rightarrow \frac{\mathrm{hc}}{{\lambda }_{\mathrm{c}}}=-13.6[\frac{1}{(3{)}^2}-\frac{1}{(2{)}^2}]\\ \frac{\mathrm{hc}}{{\lambda }_2}=13.6\left[\frac{5}{36}\right]---(ii)\end{array}$

Hence, from Eqs. (i) and (ii), we get

$\frac{{\lambda }_1}{{\lambda }_2}=\frac{20}{7}$

Q.2 The ionisation potential of hydrogen atoms is 13.6 eV. The energy required to remove an electron from the second orbit of hydrogen will be

Answer:

The potential energy of hydrogen atoms.

${\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{n}}=-\frac{13.6}{{\mathrm{n}}^2}\mathrm{eV}$

So, the potential energy in the second orbit is

$\begin{array}{r}{\mathrm{E}}_2=-\frac{136}{(2{)}^2}\mathrm{eV}\\ {\mathrm{E}}_2=-\frac{13.6}{2}\mathrm{eV}\\ =-3.4\mathrm{eV}\end{array}$

Now, the energy required to remove an electron from the second orbit to infinity is

$\mathrm{U}={\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{\infty }}-{\mathrm{E}}_2$

[from work-energy theorem and ${\mathrm{E}}_{\mathrm{\infty }}=0$ ]

$\begin{array}{r}\Rightarrow \mathrm{U}=0-(-3.4)\mathrm{eV}\\ \text{or}\mathrm{U}=3.4\mathrm{eV}\end{array}$

Hence, the required energy is 3.4 eV.

Q.3 According to the Bohr model, the radius of the electron orbit in the $\mathrm{n}=1$ level of the hydrogen atom is 0.053 nm. The radius for the $\mathrm{n}=3$ level is-

Answer:

The radius of the orbit:

$\begin{array}{r}{\mathrm{r}}_{\mathrm{n}}\alpha {\mathrm{n}}^2\\ 0.053=k\times 1^2---(1)\\ x=k\times 3^2---(2)\\ \text{By solving,}\frac{0.053}{\mathrm{x}}=\frac{\mathrm{k}\times 1^2}{1\times 3^2}\\ \frac{0.053}{x}=\frac{1}{9}\\ x=0.477\mathrm{nm}\end{array}$

Q.4 A hydrogen atom at rest emits a photon of wavelength 122 nm. The recoil speed of a hydrogen atom -

Answer:

From the Conservation of momentum,

$\begin{array}{r}0={\tilde{\mathrm{P}}}_{\text{photon}}+{\tilde{\mathrm{P}}}_{\mathrm{H}}\\ {\tilde{\mathrm{P}}}_{\mathrm{H}}=-{\tilde{\mathrm{P}}}_{\text{photon}}\\ {\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{H}}={\mathrm{P}}_{\text{photon}}\\ \mathrm{mv}=\frac{\mathrm{h}}{\lambda }\\ \mathrm{v}=\frac{\mathrm{h}}{\mathrm{m}\lambda }=\frac{6.63\times {10}^{-34}}{1.67\times {10}^{-27}\times 122\times {10}^{-9}}\\ \mathrm{v}=\frac{6.63\times {10}^{-34}\times {10}^{36}}{1.67\times {12}^2}\\ \mathrm{k}=\frac{6.63\times {10}^2}{1.67\times 122}\simeq 3.25\mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}\end{array}$

Q.5 An electron and a photon have the same energy 4 E. The ratio of the de Broglie wavelength of an electron to the wavelength of a photon (Mass of electron is m and speed of light is c)

Answer:

$\begin{array}{rl}\text{Use,}& {\lambda }_d\text{for electron}=\frac{\lambda }{\sqrt{2mE\times 4}}\\ \lambda \text{for photom}=\frac{hc}{E}=\frac{hc}{4E}\\ \text{Ratio}=& \frac{h}{\sqrt{8mE}}\times \frac{4E}{hc}\\ =& \frac{4E}{c}\times \frac{1}{2\sqrt{2mE}}=\frac{2E}{c\sqrt{2Em}}\\ =& \frac{2}{c}\sqrt{\frac{E}{2m}}\end{array}$